From Ballotpedia

Jump to: navigation, search


Foreign Policy Badge.png


Iran nuclear agreement
For more than on the Iran nuclear deal, view the following articles:
•Overview
•Joint Comprehensive Programme of Action (JCPOA)
•Negotiations
•Timeline
•Legislation
•Congressional review
•U.Due south. withheld cash until hostages were released
•U.South.-Israeli relations
•Public opinion
•Federal policy on the Iran nuclear deal, 2017-2020
•Federal policy on Iran, 2017-2020
•2016 presidential candidates on the Iran nuclear deal

Executive-Branch-Logo.png


Federal Issues
Executive powers
Barack Obama: Vetoed legislation • Executive charity and presidential pardons
Foreign affairs
Iran nuclear understanding: U.S. withheld cash until hostages were released • Congressional investigation of CENTCOM's intelligence reports on the Islamic State • Islamic republic of iran nuclear agreement: An overview • Bowe Bergdahl substitution • ISIS insurgency in Iraq and Syrian arab republic • Terrorist attack on U.Due south. mission in Benghazi, 2012
Economy
The Trans-Pacific Partnership merchandise deal: An overview • The Transatlantic Merchandise and Investment Partnership
Natural resources
Keystone Twoscore Pipeline political timeline
Healthcare
Obamacare overview • Obamacare lawsuits
Immigration
President Obama's Immigration Accountability Executive Deportment
Abortion
Republican endeavor to defund Planned Parenthood, 2015

Have you subscribed yet?

Join the hundreds of thousands of readers trusting Ballotpedia to proceed them up to appointment with the latest political news. Sign upwardly for the Daily Brew.
Click hither to acquire more.

Senators John McCain and Jack Reed heed to testimony about the JCPOA on July 29, 2015.

Members of Congress demanded the ability to review a nuclear deal with Iran before whatever action was taken and stated that they, and not President Obama, had the authority to lift or renew sanctions on Iran. The Firm unanimously canonical HR 1191 - the Iran Nuclear Understanding Review Act of 2015 on March 17, 2015.[i] The bill proposed requiring President Barack Obama to submit the details of a nuclear bargain with Iran to Congress for review if negotiators reached a final agreement. The bill also proposed a 60-day review menses for members of Congress to vote to approve or disapprove the deal, during which sanctions on Islamic republic of iran would not be lifted. Then, on May vii, 2015, the Senate voted to approve HR 1191 by a vote of 98-one. Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton fiber cast the only vote against the neb.[ii] [iii]

Cotton fiber, the author of the Senate letter to the Iranian regime, explained why he voted against the beak in the following statement: "A nuclear-artillery agreement with any antagonist—specially the terror-sponsoring, Islamist Iranian regime—should exist submitted every bit a treaty and obtain a two-thirds bulk vote in the Senate as required by the Constitution."[4]

On May 14, 2015, the House approved Senate amendments to HR 1191 by a vote of 400-25.[v] [6] After the House passed the bill, Business firm Foreign Diplomacy Committee chairman Ed Royce (R-Calif.) said, "Once this legislation is signed, when Secretarial assistant Kerry sits beyond from the Iranians, he'll now accept on his mind, 'I've got to accept this to Congress.' That prospect can only better these negotiations. And I just hope it's not too late and we aren't too deep into a bad bargain."[7]

Although Obama initially said that he would veto whatever legislation that could impairment negotiations with Iran, White House Press Secretarial assistant Josh Hostage said, "The president would be willing to sign the proposed compromise."[8] On May 22, 2015, Obama signed HR 1191, which gave Congress the power to review the nuclear deal.[5]

Congress' 60 days to review the JCPOA began on July 20, 2015, and a final decision was required by September 18, 2015.[nine] [10] During the review menstruation, Obama was precluded from lifting sanctions on Iran past the Islamic republic of iran Nuclear Understanding Review Human activity of 2015.[11]

On July 14, 2015, before the review period began, so-Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-Ohio) released a statement nigh his approach to reviewing the JCPOA. He said, "Instead of stopping the spread of nuclear weapons in the Middle East, this bargain is likely to fuel a nuclear arms race around the earth. The House of Representatives will review every detail of this agreement very closely, but I won't support any agreement that jeopardizes the safety of the American people and all who value liberty and security. This isn't near Republicans versus Democrats. Information technology's about right and wrong. And we will fight a bad deal that is wrong for our national security and wrong for our country."[12]

The Senate cast the first vote regarding the deal on September ten, 2015. Senate Democrats filibustered the measure to disapprove of the Islamic republic of iran nuclear bargain past a vote of 58-42.[13] Lx votes were needed to proceed to HJ Res 61 - the Rent More Heroes Human activity of 2015, the legislative vehicle the Senate was expected to use to disapprove of the Islamic republic of iran nuclear bargain.[14] The Senate voted on the same legislation on September xv, 2015, and it failed for a second time to by a vote of 56-42. Senators and 2016 presidential candidates Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Rand Paul (R-Ky.) did not vote.[15] The legislation was voted on for a third fourth dimension on September 17, and it failed for a tertiary time past a vote of 56-42. Paul, one time once again, did not vote. Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), besides a 2016 presidential candidate, did not vote either.[16]

The Firm took a different approach to debating the nuclear agreement. Instead of voting on ane resolution to disapprove of the nuclear bargain, the House decided to vote on three carve up pieces of legislation. The House passed the first resolution, H Res 411 - Finding that the President has non complied with section two of the Islamic republic of iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act of 2015, by a vote of 245-186 on September x, 2015. All 245 House Republicans voted for the resolution that President Obama violated section 2 of the Islamic republic of iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act of 2015, which required the president to submit all materials related to the nuclear agreement, because 2 agreements between the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and Iran were not submitted for congressional review.[17] During a July 28 congressional hearing, John Kerry explained that the White House had not been given admission to the side agreements.[18]

On September 11, 2015, the House voted confronting approving the JCPOA signed by the P5+1 and Iran. Members of the Business firm rejected Hr 3461 past a vote of 162-269. Twenty-five Democrats voted with 244 Republicans against approving the nuclear bargain.[19] [20]

On the aforementioned twenty-four hours, the Business firm voted to corroborate HR 3460, which proposed prohibiting "the President, prior to January 21, 2017, from: limiting the application of specified sanctions on Islamic republic of iran or refraining from applying any such sanctions; or removing a foreign person (including entities) listed in Attachments 3 or 4 to Annex 2 of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Activeness (JCPA) from the list of designated nationals and blocked persons maintained by the Office of Foreign Asset Command of the Department of the Treasury." Rep. Gwen Graham (Fla.) and Juan Vargas (Calif.) were the only two Democrats who voted with all 245 Republicans to suspend Obama's ability to provide Islamic republic of iran with sanctions relief. The nib passed by a vote of 247-186.[21] [22]

In a terminal effort to cease the bargain, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) proposed S Amdt 2656 to S Amdt 2640. The amendment proposed prohibiting "the President from waiving, suspending, reducing, providing relief from, or otherwise limiting the application of sanctions pursuant to an agreement related to the nuclear plan of Iran."[23] Senate Democrats filibustered the measure on September 17, 2015, by a vote of 53-45.[23] Congress did not pass any legislation that approved of or rejected the deal, despite many attempts to practise so.

See also

  • Iran nuclear agreement: An overview
  • Iran nuclear agreement: Articulation Comprehensive Programme of Activity
  • Iran nuclear agreement:Negotiations
  • Iran nuclear agreement: Timeline
  • Iran nuclear understanding: Legislation
  • 2016 presidential candidates on the Iran nuclear deal
  • Iran nuclear agreement: U.Due south. - Israeli relations
  • Iran nuclear agreement: Public opinion
  • Outline for nuclear agreement with Iran reached
  • Islamic republic of iran nuclear agreement talks resume ahead of deadline
  • 2016 presidential candidates on the Iran nuclear deal
  • John Kerry
  • Barack Obama
  • P5+1 and E3+iii

External links

  • Business firm letter to President Obama
  • Detailed Timeline of Nuclear Diplomacy with Iran
  • "Iran Nuclear Negotiations: Condition of Talks and the Function of Congress"
  • "PM Netanyahu's Speech in Congress"
  • "An Open Letter to the Leaders of the Islamic Republic of Iran"
  • "Parameters for a Joint Comprehensive Programme of Activeness Regarding the Islamic Democracy of Iran's Nuclear Program"
  • International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)

Footnotes

  1. ↑ Clerk.Business firm.gov, "Concluding Vote Results for Curl Phone call 118," accessed September 26, 2015
  2. ↑ Congress.gov, "60 minutes 1191," accessed May 8, 2015
  3. ↑ Senate.gov, "H.R. 1191," accessed May 8, 2015
  4. ↑ The Hill, "Senate overwhelmingly approves Islamic republic of iran review bill in 98-1 vote," accessed May viii, 2015
  5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 Congress.gov, "H.R.1191 - Islamic republic of iran Nuclear Understanding Review Act of 2015," accessed May 16, 2015
  6. ↑ Clerk.House.gov, "Concluding Vote Results for Roll Call 226," accessed May 16, 2015
  7. ↑ The Hill, "House sends Islamic republic of iran review neb to Obama," accessed May 16, 2015
  8. ↑ The Loma, "Iran bill passes committee unanimously," accessed April fourteen, 2015
  9. ↑ Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Jerusalem
  10. ↑ The U.s. Institute of Peace, "The Final Deal: Promises and Pitfalls," July 224, 2015
  11. ↑ The Usa Establish of Peace, "Guide to Congressional Action on Islamic republic of iran Deal," June 26, 2015
  12. ↑ Speaker.gov, "Speaker Boehner Argument on Iran Nuclear Agreement," July 14, 2015
  13. ↑ Congress.gov, "S.Amdt.2640 to H.J.Res.61," accessed September 10, 2015
  14. ↑ Congress.gov, "HJ Res 61," accessed September 10, 2015
  15. ↑ Senates.gov, "On the Cloture Motility (Move to Invoke Cloture on McConnell Amdt. No. 2640 )," accessed September 16, 2015
  16. ↑ Senate.gov, "On the Cloture Motion (Motility to Invoke Cloture on McConnell Amdt. No. 2640 )," accessed September 17, 2015
  17. ↑ Clerk.Business firm.gov, "Final Vote Results for Curlicue Call 492," accessed September 10, 2015
  18. ↑ USNews.com, "Kerry Denies Seeing Iran Deal's Side Agreements," accessed September 26, 2015
  19. ↑ Congress.gov, "Hour 3461," accessed September 11, 2015
  20. ↑ Clerk.House.gov, "Last Vote Results for Curlicue Telephone call 493," accessed September eleven, 2015
  21. ↑ Congress.gov, "60 minutes 3460," accessed September 10, 2015
  22. ↑ Clerk.House.gov, "Last Vote Results for Curlicue Call 494," accessed September 11, 2015
  23. ↑ 23.0 23.1 Congress.gov, "S.Amdt.2656 to S.Amdt.2640," accessed September 17, 2015 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "samdt2656vote" defined multiple times with different content

v•due east

U.S. Executive Co-operative
Elected offices

President Joe Biden • Vice President Kamala Harris

 Executive-Branch-Logo.png
Executive departments

Section of Defense • Department of State • Department of Homeland Security • Department of Justice • Section of Commerce • Department of Teaching • Department of the Treasury • Section of Agronomics • Department of Energy • Department of Labor • Section of Transportation • Department of the Interior • Section of Health and Human Services • Section of Veterans Affairs • Department of Housing and Urban Development
Chiffonier-level offices

Environmental Protection Bureau • Role of Management and Budget • U.Due south. Mission to the Un • Council of Economic Advisors • Small Business Assistants • White House Chief of Staff
Federally appointed offices

Federal Reserve System • National Security Counselor • White House Printing Secretary • U.South. Postmaster General • Fundamental Intelligence Agency • Federal Bureau of Investigation • Internal Acquirement Service • Agency of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives • National Security Agency • Congressional Budget Part • Federal Election Commission • Transportation Security Administration • Drug Enforcement Administration • Federal Communications Commission
Glossary

Engagement confirmation process • United States Constitution • Electoral College • Deferred activeness • Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) • Deferred Activeness for Parents of U.S. Citizens and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA) • Impeachment of federal officials • Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) • Northward American Gratis Trade Agreement (NAFTA) • P5+1 and E3+3 • Trade aligning assistance (TAA) • Trade promotion say-so (TPA)